REVISIONE DELLA LETTERATURA INTERNAZIONALE
Daniele Adami

 

J Vasc Surg. 2002 Apr;35(4):654-60.

Minimally invasive vascular surgery for repair of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm with iliac

involvement.

Matsumoto M, Hata T, Tsushima Y, Hamanaka S, Yoshitaka H, Shinoura S, Sakakibara N.

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Cardiovascular Center, Sakakibara Hospital, Okayama, Japan.

vivaldi@fa2.so-net.net.jp

  PURPOSE: A minimally invasive vascular surgery (MIVS) technique for repair of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) with iliac involvement was evaluated, and its outcome was compared with conventional open repair.

METHODS: Twenty patients with AAA with iliac involvement underwent treatment with bifurcated graft replacement with the MIVS technique. The procedure was performed via minilaparotomy, with the incision length determined according to the extent of the AAA obtained with ultrasound scanning and with the small intestine confined completely within the abdominal cavity. The proximal and distal operating fields were obtained with changing the patient position and arranging for the abdominal incision to be retracted cephalad and caudad. Perioperative courses in these 20 patients (the MIVS group) were analyzed in comparison with 14 patients who underwent conventional open repair, which was performed through the full midline laparotomy with the intestine simply covered with moistened towels (the conventional group).

RESULTS: The MIVS technique for AAA repair was performed with a mean abdominal incision length of 8.4 cm and a range from 6.5 to 11.2 cm. The patients in the MIVS group showed earlier resumption of oral intake and ambulation in comparison with those patients in the conventional group (liquid diet: 1.1 +/- 0.3 days versus 2.9 +/- 1.4 days; P <.01;

 solid diet: 2.0 +/- 0.2 days versus 3.9 +/- 1.4 days; P <.01; ambulation: 2.1 +/- 0.8 days versus 4.3 +/- 2.3 days; P <.01), with

 comparable mortality and morbidity rates. Accordingly, the patients in the MIVS group were discharged earlier (20.7 +/- 6.3 days versus 33.9 +/- 12.6 days; P <.01), and total hospitalization charges were significantly decreased (2,232,791 +/- 200,747 Japanese yen versus 2,640,441 +/- 243,889 Japanese yen; P <.01).

CONCLUSION: The MIVS technique allowed earlier postoperative recovery with comparable morbidity and mortality rates with the conventional technique and, therefore, saved hospital stay length and total hospitalization charges. Thus, the MIVS technique is considered as a new and effective minimally invasive technique for open AAA repair.

 

 

J Vasc Surg. 2003 Apr;37(4):744-9.

Laparoscopy-assisted abdominal aortic aneurysm endoaneurysmorraphy: early and mid-term results.

Alimi YS, Di Molfetta L, Hartung O, Dhanis AF, Barthelemy P, Aissi K, Giorgi R, Juhan C.

Department of Vascular Surgery, Hopital Nord, Universite de la Mediterranee, Marseilles, France. yalimi@ap-hm.fr

OBJECTIVES: This study was undertaken to evaluate the consequences on patient selection and on early and mid-term results during the learning curve of a surgical team performing laparoscopy-assisted surgery to treat abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA).

PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between December 1998 and January 2002, 24 patients (22 men, 2 women; mean age, 68.2 years [range, 57-82 years]) were included in a prospective study and underwent laparoscopic transperitoneal AAA dissection followed by graft implantation through a 6 to 9 cm minilaparotomy. Perioperative data for the first 10 patients, obtained during the first 25 months of the study (group 1), were compared with data for the last 14 patients, obtained during the last 13 months of the study (group 2). Follow-up consisted of clinical examination or duplex scanning, or both, at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months and yearly thereafter, and computed tomographic scanning before discharge and yearly thereafter.

RESULTS: One patient (4.3%) died in the immediate postoperative period. In this patient and two others (12.5%), the minilaparotomy was extended intraoperatively, from 12 cm to 16 cm. With experience, initial contraindications such as obesity and short proximal or calcified aortic neck were eliminated, enabling increase in rate of patients included, from 27.7% during the first 25 first months to 56% during the last 13 months (P =.063). Mean duration of operative clamping decreased from 275 minutes in group 1 to 195 minutes in group 2 (P <.0001), and mean duration of aortic clamping decreased from 101 minutes in group 1 to 52 minutes in group 2 (P <.0001). The number of early repeat interventions was

reduced from 3 (30%) in group 1 to 2 (14.3%) in group 2 (P =.61), and clinical recovery period decreased from 6.8 days to 4.3 days (P <.005). During mean follow-up of 17.1 months (range, 3-38 months), no late aortoiliac procedures were necessary and no prosthetic abnormality was detected.

CONCLUSION: This minimally invasive video-assisted technique provides good postoperative comfort and excellent mid-term results. Developments in experience and instrumentation have enabled us to include a growing number of patients and to reduce the duration of the procedure.

 

 

Ann Vasc Surg. 2003 Mar;17(2):180-4. Epub 2003 Mar 14.

Minimal incision aortic surgery (MIAS).

Turnipseed WD, Carr SC, Hoch JR, Cohen JR.

turnip@surgery.wisc.edu

This study evaluates the clinical and economic impact of using less extensive minimal invasive aortic surgery (MIAS) for elective treatment of infrarenal aortic aneurysms (AAA) and aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD) in two independent surgical departments. Surgeons from two institutions conducted a prospective consecutive, nonrandomized analysis of MIAS electively performed in 80 patients. MIAS outcomes were compared with 80 consecutive elective standard open aortic procedures (40 from each institution), which were performed during the same time period. Cost analyses for MIAS and standard open repair were performed at each institution. Our results indicated that MIAS is as safe as standard open repair, is more cost-effective, and has significantly shorter hospital stays than with standard open repair.

 

 

Cardiovasc Surg. 2003 Jun;11(3):179-84.

Epidural analgesia in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease undergoing transperitoneal

abdominal aortic aneurysmorraphy--a multi-institutional analysis.

Bush RL, Lin PH, Reddy PP, Chen C, Weiss VJ, Guinn G, Lumsden AB.

Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA. rbush@bcm.tmc.edu

INTRODUCTION: Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are more likely to develop pulmonary morbidity following major abdominal surgery. The purpose of this study was to examine the utility of epidural analgesia in patients with COPD who underwent elective transperitoneal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. METHODS: During a 7-year period, all patients diagnosed with COPD undergoing elective AAA repair (n=425) from three hospitals were reviewed. Inclusion criteria were an FEV(1)/FVC ratio <75% and/or a PaCO(2)>45 mmHg. Clinical outcomes were compared between those who received epidural analgesia (epidural group) and those who did not (control group). Primary endpoints measured were duration of intubation, ICU stay, hospital days, and pulmonary complications.

RESULTS: Strict inclusion criteria were met by 131 patients, which included 86 patients in the epidural group and 45 patients in the control group. When comparing the epidural vs. control group, the mean AAA size was 6.3+/-0.9 cm vs. 6.0+/-1.5 cm (NS), FEV(1) was 57.2+/-24.7% vs. 49.0+/-10.3% (NS), and the mean FEV(1)/FVC ratio was 52.0+/-11.4% vs. 50.6+/-6.7% (NS), respectively. The epidural group had a significantly lower incidence of post-operative ventilator dependency and ICU stay (p<0.05), as well as a decreased trend in pulmonary complications when compared to the control group. The overall hospital stay remained similar between the two groups. The relative risk of developing a pulmonary complication in the absence of epidural analgesia was 2.3.

CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative epidural analgesia is beneficial in patients with COPD undergoing AAA repair by reducing both the post-operative ventilator duration and ICU stay. Epidural analgesia should be considered in all COPD patients undergoing elective transperitoneal AAA repair.

 

HOME